Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to Math2.0
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorRalph Furmaniak
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2012
    • (edited Mar 28th 2012)

    Hi all. A colleague suggested that I post this here. As an experiment I have set up the reddit software to work with the arxiv database, which you can see at http://arxaliv.org/

    Each day it will update the list with the latest papers and you can upvote, downvote, comment, save links of interest, search, post new links, or create your own communities/arxalivs to post in or have others post links or writings of interest to them. You can de facto implement a journal this way with the editors/reviewers as the moderators.

    To go to a specific category you can either click on the “my arxalivs” link at the top-left, or go to, eg, http://arxaliv.org/r/math.NT

    Please let me know what you think, and whether there would be any use to a site like this!

  1. Great idea!

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthordarij grinberg
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2012
    • (edited Mar 29th 2012)

    So, what exactly can we do? Just comment and vote? No attachments? LaTeX? What about the legal status of the comments (CC? GFDL? PD? nothing?)?

    I’m not criticizing, I just want to know; there seems to be no FAQ or anything like one. Or will this be amended in the next beta?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2012
    • (edited Mar 29th 2012)

    One feature/bug which should be addressed is that papers which are classed under several subject headings show up multiple times, e.g.

    Exact real-time dynamics of the quantum Rabi model (Wolf; Kollar; Braak) (http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.6039)

    which shows up three times under math.MP, math_ph, quant_ph. On the front page there are seven papers which are repeated (two of them three times, and the rest twice) which clogs up the interface - people will need to scroll down/click next more times than should be necessary.

  2. So, what exactly can we do? Just comment and vote? No attachments? LaTeX? What about the legal status of the comments (CC? GFDL? PD? nothing?)?

    What would you like to see done with the comments? I can make a note on it once I know what it should be. I will work on adding LaTeX support for the titles and comments. For the most part, Arxiv is great for handling uploading, storage, processing, LaTeX submission, etc, and I was thinking that this would just be a basic overlay on top of that, and I’ll hopefully find out what is needed to make it useful.

  3. One feature/bug which should be addressed is that papers which are classed under several subject headings show up multiple times

    Yes, this is unfortunate, and I’m not sure how to deal with it without rewriting a significant chunk of the code. The fastest way would be to have everything posted in one spot, and then tag it with the categories that it was submitted to. This would allow searching, but not allow browsing through categories as in /r/math.CO . Ideally one would just have a single post per paper and have it appear in each of the categries. Is there any benefit whatsoever to having separate postings per article-category?

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthordarij grinberg
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2012

    rfurman: either LaTeX and/or uploading attachments (TeX and PDF) is necessary, I think.

    Other than that, free licensing as a default should be added ASAP; if you add it too late, everything people contributed before will be of unclear legal status and therefore a major pain in the ass.

    About categories: what happens if the arXiv admins recategorify a paper? (This happens not so rarely.)

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2012

    Is there any benefit whatsoever to having separate postings per article-category?

    There definitely is if people are browsing by category, but something like this should be implemented as tags on posts. I don’t know anything about how the reddit system works, though, so I have no idea if that sort of feature is available.

  4. I’ll add in the copyright notice. Currently if the paper changes categories it will be listed under both (although the old and/or non-primary ones could be hidden or lowered in value). For now I can make it so that the copies do not all show up together on the main page, but it also looks possible to make the system support multiple-tags per article. Thanks for the comments!

  5. Also, if anybody is available to help with any of copy writing, testing, coding, logistics, hosting, promotion, design, user interface/experience, etc etc, it would be greatly appreciated

  6. Is there any thought of extending this to the cs.XX categories (like .CC/CG/DS) ?
  7. Is there any thought of extending this to the cs.XX categories (like .CC/CG/DS) ?

    Already there

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorScott Morrison
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2012

    I didn’t have a chance to look until now. The CSS files aren’t loading, so nothing is readable for me.

  8. The CSS files aren’t loading, so nothing is readable for me.

    Does it work now? The site has been a bit in flux lately, but it now is on a larger more stable server, it has all 750,000 arXiv papers (I am looking into bringing in data from other sources too) and each paper is posted once and cross listed to each category.

    • CommentRowNumber15.
    • CommentAuthorScott Morrison
    • CommentTimeApr 9th 2012

    Yes, the problem seems to have vanished. There doesn’t seem to be any content yet, of course. (That is, comments.)

    • CommentRowNumber16.
    • CommentAuthorAlexander Chervov
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2012
    • (edited Jun 16th 2012)
    Great idea. Somebody is using it? Unfortunately I do not see much activity... we are not reading papers of others? ;)

    How to find some comments? The only I found is "test...."
  9. After some searching I found 3 papers with comments (not just "test..")
    Why so low ? How to make it work ?

    (toggle "comment" on the top screen )

    http://arxaliv.org/tb/h6zy

    http://arxaliv.org/tb/hd5y

    http://arxaliv.org/tb/48yi
    (This seems become a publically famous paper )
  10. Cross post: http://arxaliv.org/r/help/comments/12hd/welcome_to_arxaliv/is

    @Ralf is it possible to create an option that will give list papers which have comments ?
    I think it is very important. I do not think "voting" is something important at the early stage of the project - we do not have enough statistics, but reading comments is I think very valuable !
    Also a possible author of the comments I would be happy that my efforts would be visible.

    Also is it possible to create "trackback" in arXiv site for each comment here ? Again it will add more visiability for efforts here.
  11. Thanks for the suggestions! I’m in the process of redesigning the main pages and there will definitely be a list of active discussions and top comments (currently you can see them at http://arxaliv.org/comments ). I’ll contact arXiv and make sure I can be approved for trackbacks.

  12. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers